(no subject)

[taffimai]

Hey, look! It's a why-there-is-not-as-much-f/f-as-there-is-m/m discussion that managed to stay civil. Well, it almost managed to stay civil. But that one slip from civility was made up for by the award winner for Funniest Thing Said to Taffy 2005:

"Well...don't you ever want to read about women? Like, not necessarily in a sexual way, but is the only reason you want to read about men is their hot hot cock?"

Comments

[taffimai.livejournal.com]

You know, as much as I think that orientation has a lot to do with fic preferences, I don't think it's necessarily a one-to-one relationship.

Personally, I have trouble reading f/f because so much of it is written by men who are writing about the characters so they can envision the hot actresses going at it, and characterization and emotions tend to go AWOL. I just don't find that hot. So I've learned to get my fix from female characters by reading the characters I love in het, gen, and lesbian original fiction.

If there was an archive of women-written f/f, I'd be much more likely to read it.

And no worries, we all know that you're lesbian-friendly. *snuggles*

[janedavitt.livejournal.com]

I don't think it's necessarily a one-to-one relationship.

I don't think it is either. What triggers responses to anything, from a preference to grapefruit juice over orange to liking m/m better than f/f or the reverse, is hard to define, and sexual responses, whether innate or conditioned are off the scale messy and complicated. Which is why they're fun to discuss, I guess.

I've found that I prefer erotica written by women myself; on LJ most of it is, so that doesn't get tested much, but I was on a group where most of the Buffy writers were male and their f/f and het was... not for me. None of them wrote m/m.

::snuggles you back::