taffimai: (Innuendo Squad by nixxie_)
[personal profile] taffimai
I've been pondering the continuity issues raises by the clip we saw of "Utopia" and what we saw in "End of Days" and I have an idea ...

What if they're both accurate?

Everyone's been looking at the Utopia trailer as a huge problem, since the only thing that we know from End of Days is that Jack didn't go out through the tourist office. It certainly looked like the Doctor picked him up from the Hub, but Jack taking the invisible lift up to the Plass was certainly possible. And yet in Utopia he's clearly running to catch the Tardis on the Plass from that direction of the tourism office.

And that's not the only problem.

In Utopia Jack has a rucksack, but it definitely doesn't look like he had time to grab a bag in End of Days. Now it's not a hard sell that Jack always keeps a bag packed, just in case, but it doesn't seem likely that he's keep it in the middle of the hub, and it doesn't seem like there would have been time to grab it from anywhere else.

Finally, in End of Days Jack has just revived, he looked like hell and seemed weak. In Utopia he's all-out sprinting towards the Tardis. This isn't a huge issue, since we have lots of evidence of Jack pushing himself and doing what's needed, but it's a little strange.

So why assume that the two are mutally exclusive? What if Jack did get picked up by the Doctor in the Hub, a Doctor from a later point in his timeline who wanted to get Jack ready to face his younger self? It would resolve all the issues in continuity, since the Doctor would have dropped him off just out of site on the Plass, Jack could have packed a bag from his old room in the Tardis, and the Doctor would have given him some time to recover his strength. Plus, given the little we've seen of the Doctor in Utopia, I could see older-Doctor wanting to prepare Jack for the idiocy of his younger self.

Obviously it's a bit early to know if this works, but I thought it was interesting. What do you all think?

Date: 2007-05-20 07:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miss-zedem.livejournal.com
Or....we just have a great big gaping plot hole and a massive continuity error. Cos the writers at DW couldn't figure out a way to tie it in to TW without confusing the kiddies and the adults who haven't seen TW. So they didn't even try, other than having Jack dressed in approximately the right outfit, and running from a direction that TW viewers will recognise as being from the tourist office.

I don't think they'll bother to explain. *is bitter and twisted* ;)

Date: 2007-05-20 07:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] taffimai.livejournal.com
Yeah, that's kind of where I was going with it. I wasn't trying to predict the canon, so much as present a fanon explanation. And was maybe hoping that some talented writer might write the story.

Date: 2007-05-20 08:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miss-zedem.livejournal.com
Based on how things are looking at the moment, fanon is way better than canon, so I don't see why your explanation couldn't work!

And was maybe hoping that some talented writer might write the story. Write it! I'd like to see it.

Date: 2007-05-20 08:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] taffimai.livejournal.com
See, I like it when fanon and canon work together. When the fanon is a clever explanation of the holes in the canon, it's just so wonderful.

Write it! I'd like to see it.

Yeah, but my writing isn't really good, so I try to leave it to others.

Profile

taffimai: (Default)
taffimai

May 2012

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 25th, 2025 05:43 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios